An Ancient Legacy
1997 | Tina Oldknow
God is the light of the Heavens and the Earth.
His light is as a niche in which is a lamp,
The lamp in a glass,
The glass, as it were, a glittering star.
The first Chihuly Persians were made in 1986. An eccentric collection of brightly colored and unusually shaped objects - primarily small bottles and vessels - the earliest Persians looked “archaeological” to Chihuly, like excavated ancient treasures. Chihuly sensed that these objects represented a formal direction in his art that was experimental, new, and exotic. Exhibited for the first time in Chihuly’s 1986 solo exhibition at the Musée des Arts Décoratifs of the Palais du Louvre in Paris, the Persians were described in the exhibition catalogue as “new possibilities from the blowpipe.”2 At the time of the Louvre show, the series was still untitled.
“In the beginning, the Persians had to do with the contrast between two colors ... between open and closed forms ... and the intensity of the body wraps,” Chihuly has recalled. (“Body wrap” is Chihuly’s term for the stripe of color applied to the body of a piece.) Soon, the early Persians’ color-saturated, contrasting body wraps were seen by the artist as alternately “Persian,” “Byzantine,” and “minaret-like,” almost “Persian and Roman too.” More interested in the East than the West, Chihuly liked the sound of the word “Persian,” the associations it inspired, and the series found a name.3
In discussing Chihuly’s work, the artist and art critic Walter Darby Bannard has observed, “There is a popular misconception that great modernist art always makes a radical break with the past. In fact, very good, new art often breaks with the present by going back to the past.”4 While Chihuly’s art is undeniably of the present, the presence of the past is manifest. In Chihuly’s Persians, I see a profound connection to the past, but it is a subtle and mysterious connection, as complex as the history of Persia itself and as unconscious as the intricate path of its cultural legacy. What is Persian about Chihuly’s Persians? Persia’s past, the past of glass, and the larger context of the Near East will offer some answers.
While Chihuly’s art is undeniably of the present, the presence of the past is manifest. In Chihuly’s Persians, I see a profound connection to the past, but it is a subtle and mysterious connection.
With their opaque and vivid, contrasting colors, Chihuly’s early Persians hint at glass’s distant past: the small, dense, and rare core-formed vessels that first appeared in Egypt about 1500 B.C. and in Mesopotamia (Iraq) around 1300 B.C. Several types of core-formed vessels were popular in ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, where they functioned, among other things, as cosmetic tubes for kohl, the distinctive black eye makeup worn by Egyptian women. Similar vessels were used by classical Greeks as containers for scented soaps and oils. Core-formed wares were made by carefully winding ribbons of molten glass around a primarily clay core, and then picking out the core after the glass had cooled. Their production in the eastern Mediterranean region peaked from the 6th through the 2nd century B.C.
Core-forming and other early techniques, such as casting, were eclipsed around the middle of the 1st century B.C. with the discovery of glassblowing, a technological leap that dramatically affected the ancient glass industry. Blowing glass enabled Roman glass manufacturers to expand the trade from the elite practice that it was in earlier times to a profitable commercial enterprise mass-producing products everyone, citizen or slave, could afford to own. In spite of its transformation from a labor-intensive luxury medium into an inexpensive material, glass was still sought after for finer wares, such as the elaborately decorated glasses that rivaled items made of precious stones, silver, and gold.5 In the Roman novel The Satyricon one of the characters, a wealthy nobleman named Trimalchio, expounds upon the merits of the versatile new material, claiming that glass vessels would be better than vessels made of bronze, and even vessels made of gold, were glass not so breakable.6
Some of the most outstanding glass objects to survive antiquity are the cast and cut vessels made by Persian artisans during the 5th and 4th centuries B.C. The powerful Persian empire was centered at the royal Achaemenid complex at Persepolis, located in southwestern Iran, near modern Shiraz. Ancient Persepolis was renowned for its splendid architecture and the opulent lifestyle of its wealthy and learned court, where exquisitely cast-glass bowls, molded in the shape of large rosettes, were among the royal accoutrements presented at official court occasions. The Greek playwright Aristophanes, writing around 425 B.C., relates that rock crystal-like glass bowls were provided to Greek ambassadors attending diplomatic functions at Ecbatana, the former Median capital and Persian stronghold.7
Persepolis was founded by the Achaemenid Persian king Darius I (reigned 521-486 B.C.), who expanded the empire founded by his predecessor Cyrus the Great (reigned 549-530 B.C.). It is thought that Persepolis served not only as a royal residence and administrative center for the Persian empire but also functioned as the primary locale for the celebration of the New Year each spring, the most important ritual event of the Persian calendar. The famous reliefs showing Persian dignitaries and tribute-bearers lining the double staircase leading to the apadana, or audience hall, at Persepolis are thought to mirror actual events that took place there during the New Year festivities.8 Ceremonies included the presentation of gifts from the empire’s subject peoples: the precious bowls carried by delegates, as shown in the reliefs, may represent works in metal or glass.9
Alexander the Great, still a relatively young man, died at Babylon in 323 B.C., only seven years after the sack of Persepolis by his armies. The Persian lands, representing a fraction of Alexander’s empire, which extended from Greece to India, were passed on to one of his top generals, Seleucus (reigned 312-281 B.C.), the founder of the Seleucid dynasty. The Seleucids ruled Persia for nearly 150 years, until the conquest of Iran by the nomadic Parthians in 141 B.C. The Parthian’s hold over Persia gradually declined as the Romans made inroads into Parthian territory, but they were ultimately deposed by the Sasanian Persians in the third century A.D. The Sasanians sought to revive the ancient Achaemenid empire of Cyrus and Darius and the sophistication of their courts. They reinstated many of the early Persian traditions, among them the crafting of thick-walled, spectacularly wheel-cut, luxury glass vessels.10
Some three hundred years later, the Sasanians were expelled from Persia by invading Muslim Arabs in 651. With this conquest, Persia became one of the many Near Eastern cultures to be subsumed into the powerful and growing empire of Islam and would remain forever under the aegis of the prophet Mohammed. Thus, the concept of “Persia” does not end with the grand and ancient empire but must include the scholarly, courtly world of Islam.
Byzantine and Islamic Glass
Considering the momentous advances in glass technology and decorative techniques during the height of the Roman empire - from the 1st century B.C. to the 3rd century A.D. - the following thousand years, for glassmaking at least, were relatively quiet. While western Europe fell prey to invasions of marauding tribes after the fall of Rome in the 5th century A.D., what was once the eastern Roman empire, centered at Constantinople (Istanbul), flourished under Byzantine Greeks. Lasting nearly a thousand years, the Christian Byzantine empire was dealt its final blow with the sack of Constantinople in 1453, at the hands of the Muslim Ottoman Turks.
Even today, Byzantine glass production remains somewhat mysterious. Ancient tax records reveal that glass was made in Constantinople, and it is said that at Corinth, on mainland Greece, the first pane glass, used for glazing, was made.11 Although Byzantine art is renowned for outstanding glass mosaics, preserved in Byzantine sacred architecture, the few glass vessels that have survived tell us little about the full range of glass objects that might have been available in Byzantine times. Known examples generally tend to be rudimentary blown and mold-blown wares, or they are the kind of spectacular luxury object - cast, blown, cut, and enameled - belonging to the treasury of the basilica of San Marco in Venice. Glass vessels from classical antiquity have been preserved by the thousands in ancient Roman tombs, but Christian burial customs discouraged the interment of grave gifts with the deceased. As a result, there is not as complete a picture for Byzantine and western Medieval glass, in terms of quantity and available forms and colors, as there is for earlier Greek and Roman cultures.
When the Byzantine capital of Constantinople was first taken and plundered during the Fourth Crusade in A.D. 1204, European crusaders absconded with a variety of art treasures, including glasses with enameled and gilt decoration. It was during this raid that the famous glass objects in the treasury of San Marco were brought to Venice by Venetian crusaders returning from the Byzantine capital. Whether those splendid objects were Byzantine, though, is now a matter of debate. Like the exquisite enameled and gilt glasses brought to Europe at that time, it is thought that the San Marco glass vessels may have been of Islamic rather than Byzantine origin. Because of the pervasive Oriental influence on Byzantine decorative arts and textiles of the period, distinctions between purely Byzantine and Islamic design elements have proved difficult to make.12
In the meantime, Persia and Syria, under Muslim hegemony from the 7th century on, were governed by a succession of Ummayid and Abbasid dynastic rulers. Syria was an important glassmaking region throughout antiquity, and its glass industry continued to be strong after the fall of Rome, although it was rivaled in Islamic times by important centers at Baghdad and Cairo. After the Mongol invasions of Persia and Mesopotamia in the middle of the 13th century, Syrian glass production rose to the fore. The 13th and 14th centuries in Syria - the period of Ayyubid and Mamluk rule - represented the pinnacle of Islamic glass manufacture and remains one of the most important achievements ill the entire history of glass.13 In addition to their elaborate cut-glass vessels, Islamic glassworkers were known for luster-painting, a decorative technique first practiced in Egypt around the 7th to 8th century and in Persia after the 9th century. Luster-painting, or painting with metallic oxide pigments to create semi-transparent, iridescent colors, was the precursor of the highly regarded Islamic techniques of enameling and gilding on glass, developed, it is thought, sometime between 1170 and 1270 at the Syrian city of Raqqa.14 The finest enameled and gilt wares for which Islamic glass-makers became famous, however, were produced not at Raqqa but at the Syrian city of Damascus.15 Most prized of the Islamic luxury wares from Damascus were the richly enameled and gilt mosque lamps - actually lamp-holders or lanterns - which were illuminated by their enclosed oil-lamps.16
Islamic glass production abruptly ceased when Damascus and Aleppo, in Syria, were overrun in 1400 by the Turco-Mongol armies of Timur, a central Asian Muslim warlord known in the West as Tamerlane. This vacancy was soon filled by the rising Italian industry, centered in Venice, which would grow to dominate European glass manufacture. The demand for Islamic-style glass did not end with the Syrian industry, and Venetian glassmakers carried on Islamic-style productions, in addition to their own celebrated designs, for the next two centuries.17
The practice of decorative enameling and gilding on glass by Venetian craftsmen, which peaked around 1500, is thought to be inherited from the Islamic glass industry. Certainly, the Venetian republic had maintained close trading contacts with the Near East and was producing Islamic-style glass and textiles.18 Some historians see Muslim influence in the architecture of Venice, such as the preference for domes decorated with polychrome inlays or the Venetian love of gardens, courtyards, and fountains.19 But it is more likely that these influences spread to Venice from Byzantine Constantinople. Not only was Venice the “favorite daughter of Byzantium,” a title given to the city in 1000 by the Byzantine emperor Basil II,20 but the Venetian Doge Pietro Ziani went so far as to propose in 1222 that the entire city of Venice be abandoned and moved to Constantinople. Legend has it that Ziani’s controversial motion was defeated in the Venetian senate by only one vote.21
Concerning the origins of Venetian glass, some historians believe that there is no way of establishing whether Venetians acquired the techniques of enameling and gilding on glass from Islamic glasshouses or Byzantine ones, but that because of Venice’s long-standing relationship with Byzantium, it was from artisans of that empire whom early Venetian glassmakers sought direction.22 The most detailed description of glassmaking in the Middle Ages is preserved in a treatise, entitled On Divers Arts, authored by a German Benedictine monk under the pseudonym Theophilus. Writing in the early 12th century, Theophilus recorded the Byzantine Greek practice of making “blue stones [glass mosaic tesserae], and precious goblets for drinking, embellishing them with gold.” The monk also carefully described how Byzantine glassmakers prepared their enamels: “White, red and green glass, which are used for enamels, are carefully ground, each one separately, with water on a porphyry stone. With them, the [Greeks] paint small flowers and scrolls.”23
Byzantine traditions abound in the architecture and rich decoration of the Venetian basilica of San Marco, originally the chapel of the Palace of the Doges, the august governors of the Venetian republic. Begun in the 9th century- at which time the relics of the evangelist Mark were “acquired” (that is, stolen) from Alexandria, in Egypt24 - the great church was built primarily during the 11th century, but not completed until the 13th century.25 San Marco has been described as an “eloquent memorial” of the Byzantine contribution to Venetian culture, “a living symbol of the close relations between Byzantium and Venice.”26 At the same time, San Marco is said to have unmistakably Islamic features, such as the arch of the Door of the Flowers, but that, for the most part, “the Byzantine and Islamic elements harmonize so perfectly that is difficult to distinguish one from the other.”27
The magnificent bronze horses of San Marco, which dominate the facade above the basilica’s main doorway, are another important example of the profound connection between Venice and Byzantium, reflecting the Byzantine fusion of classical Western and Eastern traditions to which the architecture and culture of Venice is indebted. Their source, like much of Venice’s own history, is shrouded in mystery, and while many theories abound about their origins, none are provable. The only sure element of the horses’ history is that they found their way from Constantinople to Venice, as crusader war booty, in 1204.28
Venetian Glass and Art Nouveau
As the late curator Henry Geldzahler noted, there is a correlation between Dale Chihuly and the champion of American art nouveau, Louis Comfort Tiffany, in their understanding of, and interest in, the history of glass.29 The New York Times critic Holland Cotter has also seen in Chihuly’s work “the painterly, chromatic complexity of Venetian glass and the sensuous curves of art nouveau.”30 Because of Louis Comfort Tiffany, the ephemeral, iridescent colors of ancient Roman glass and ancient combed decoration were revived, becoming central to the aesthetic of American art nouveau glass at the turn of this century.
Persian pottery as well as ancient glass were important influences on art nouveau, and of the many stylistic associations to be found in Chihuly’s Persian, the art nouveau connection may be the most surprising. Although some of the more obvious art historical parallels for certain of Chihuly’s Persians forms are the lily-leaf pitchers and long-necked bottles typical of 17th- and 18th-century Persian glass production, parallels may also be seen in the orientalizing designs produced by Tiffany Studios at the turn of this century, or the Bohemian (Czechoslovakian) art nouveau glass made by the firm of Pallme-Kônig & Habel around 1900-1920.31 Certain Persian elements are also seen in post-World War II Venetian glass, specifically in the designs made by Swedish artist Tyra Lundgren for Venini Glass in 1948. Lundgren’s series, called vetro fenicio, featured an asymmetrical, leaf-shaped lip and stripes of color, alternating with colorless bands, that imitated ancient and art-nouveau-style combed decoration.32
For Chihuly, the city of Venice has held a continuing fascination. His 1968 residency in Venice, at Venini Fabrica on the island of Murano, introduced him not only to historic Venetian glassblowing techniques but also to a spirit of team-working, a gracious style of living, and an opulent color aesthetic that would become an important influence on his own design philosophy. In the catalogue published in conjunction with the artist’s solo exhibition at the Seattle Art Museum in 1992, the curator Patterson Sims noted in his essay, entitled Scuola di Chihuly: Venezia and Seattle, that Chihuly’s love of exotic and extravagant color was positively “redolent of Venetian art.”33 All the colors of Venice, from the luminous pinks of its incomparable twilight to the vivid, almost garish golds, reds, and bright stripes of its architectural exteriors and interiors are reflected in Chihuly’s remarkably diverse palette. Subtle, intense, simple, complicated, dark, light: Chihuly’s colors are his signature.
Perhaps more than anything else, I see the riotous color, contrasting textures, and exotic, Eastern cast of Venice as the spiritual source of the Persians.
Culturally and aesthetically, Venice can be appreciated as a product of the Persian, Byzantine Greek, and Muslim East, rather than the Latin West, with the basilica of San Marco as an outstanding example of the characteristically Venetian assimilation of classical, Byzantine, and Islamic cultures. When I look at Chihuly’s Persians, I imagine all the influences of these great ancient civilizations as well as modern art movements, such as art nouveau. But perhaps more than anything else, I see the riotous color, contrasting textures, and exotic, Eastern cast of Venice as the spiritual source of the Persians, celebrating the mystery and romance of Venice as much as the distant, yet powerful, presence of Persia and Byzantium.
Chihuly’s Persians, with their expansive vocabulary of forms, multitude of colors, and varied scale, are particularly effective in large-scale contexts. “Ultimately, Dale's work reveals his understanding and continued respect for the vessel,” observes James Carpenter, a New York-based artist and architectural designer who collaborated with Chihuly on some of his most experimental work in the early 1970s. However, Carpenter adds, Chihuly approaches the vessel form “not as a container, but as an incredible environment”34 Nowhere is this more true than in the Persian installations, where Chihuly plays with repetition and scale in his transformation of the hollow object from humble container to lavish environment.
Beginning with the small and experimental pieces, Chihuly gradually pushed his Persians into larger, more sophisticated groupings of color and form. The scale of these elegant groupings, in turn, swelled to become room-size installations. The critic David Bourbon, writing for Art in America, has described the irrepressible Persian installations as flamboyant corsages, “commanding attention for both the sheer gorgeousness of their undulating forms and for the spectacular manner in which they spill into the room, [their] ornate edges all but alive with potential movement”35 The extraordinary vitality of the Persian installations is awe-inspiring, the pieces delicate and aggressive at the same time. The art historian Linda Norden recently touched on this contrast with her comment that the installations had taken on “an aspect of fecundity and self-proliferation which also may account for ... their slightly threatening aura.”36
For Chihuly, each Persian grouping represents an environment, and no matter how big or small, these environments remain conceptually linked to each other through their relationship to the space they inhabit. Chihuly, asserts the curator Sarah Bremser, is “primarily an installation artist ... When he conceives of an artwork, he is thinking not merely about how objects will be placed but how he can deliver a cogent and successful architectural, aesthetic and experiential statement. As the artist himself says, ‘I am as interested in the way my art works in a space as in the art itself.’”37
The genesis of the Persian environments is, in hindsight, a logical progression, illustrating Chihuly’s love of change and his desire to push his materials. The first Persians installations were little more than groupings of objects removed from their pedestals and placed on shelves. Next came the wall pieces. The earliest examples, such as the 1988 installation at Chancellor Park in La Jolla, California, combined Persians shelf groupings with wall-mounted pieces placed above the shelf, extending the surface area of the glass. Over time, smaller vessels disappeared from the installations, and the groupings became larger and fuller, turning into a collage on the wall, as in the 1992 installation at Union Bank Center in Seattle, Washington. The Persians then became more site-specific with window collages such as the 16 by 16 foot commission for Little Caesars corporate world headquarters in Detroit, Michigan, in 1993. With the transition from the adornment of space to the interpretation of it, Chihuly’s Persians no longer could be regarded as discrete objects but as an environment to be experienced.
The Persians are most powerful when their color and form can envelope a space. “Dale’s real forte is in sensing the value of an idea,” remarks James Carpenter. “He has a very good interior sense of things so that, intuitively, in setting up an idea for a form, he develops an idea for its space as well. He has a sense of the way color changes an environment.”38
From their enclosed wall and window environments, the Persians expanded to the floor for a 1991 installation in Kyoto, Japan - when Chihuly created a special enclosure by placing a collection of Persians beneath large glass plates. Liberated from their vitrines, they freely spread to windows and ceiling for the artists solo exhibition at the Seattle Art Museum in 1992. The first truly “environmental” Persians at SAM showed the window and ceiling installations to be ideal vehicles for the series. A 1994 window piece he created for Tacoma’s Union Station was titled Monarch Window, an association that aptly captures the sense of movement of the bewitching, butterflylike orange and yellow Persians flitting across their airy domain.
Chihuly’s dramatic installations, with their opulent combination of colors and textures, hint at the lavish spectacles and sumptuous pageants so adored by the Byzantines and the Venetians.
However, it is in the ceiling installations, called Pergolas, that Chihuly has created an actual architecture for the Persians, an environment where they can be exploited to their fullest potential. Lit from above and viewed from below, each Persian detail appears crisp, each hue sharp. A sweeping area of striated color might have wedged beneath it a tiny, ancient form, while a collection of tumbled vessels can be individually explored in an intimate manner often impossible in the wall installations. In the Pergolas, environment becomes a complete sensory experience, enabling the viewer to gain access into a perfect, self-contained, other world, a garden of light, color, and line. Chihuly’s dramatic installations, with their opulent combination of colors and textures, hint at the lavish spectacles and sumptuous pageants so adored by the Byzantines and the Venetians. A primary function of pageantry and ceremonial architecture is to move its participants from one, everyday world into another, marvelous or sublime, one. Western medieval architects effected the transformation of their sacred environments with acres of stained glass and soaring spires. For Muslim architects, the stalactitelike formations of muqarnas were the key to the metamorphosis of interior space. Breaking up the light and space on ceilings, domes, and in corners, muqarnas transformed secular space into a beautiful “dome of heaven.” Through their dynamic light, color, and line, the Persian Pergolas, too, transform everyday space into a paradisaic environment of wonder.
The Garden of Heaven and the Pleasure Dome
Reflecting on what is Persian about Chihuly’s Persians, certain themes emerge, such as the historical and cultural references or the stylistic similarities with ancient, Islamic, and art nouveau glasses discussed earlier in this essay. There are other quintessential Persian ideas, however, that can be explored in the context of the Persians. These are the related concepts of the Persian garden and the Persian carpet.
In Islam, the perfect world, or paradise, is represented by the garden, a place of marvel, wonder, and other physical and spiritual delights. While Chihuly’s Persian installations may be linked conceptually with the idea of the Persian garden of paradise, the most direct, visual comparison for the installations may be the Persian carpet.
Carpets are known to have been made in Persia at least since the time of the First Achaemenid ruler, Cyrus the Great. Legend has it that his tomb was covered with the precious textiles.
The influence of textiles crops up repeatedly in Chihuly’s work - who began his artistic career as a weaver - and is evident in series such as the Navajo Blanket Cylinders or his Baskets which enabled the artist to combine an “early interest in weaving with his passion for glassblowing.”39
Of the many varieties of historic Persian carpets, the most meaningful for this discussion are the medallion-style and garden-style carpets, characterized by their many colors and patterns as well as by the juxtaposition of small and large (medallion) forms. Persian installations use a similarly broad but unified palette of color and pattern expressed through an arrangement of various-sized forms, simultaneously appearing ordered and scattered at random.
More thematically related to Chihuly’s work, perhaps, are the historic garden carpets. Inspired by the centuries-old Persian love of gardens and their cultivation, these carpets incorporate flowerbeds, paths, fountains, and pools in their designs. The most famous of the carpets was the royal Spring of Khosroe - set with precious stones and pearls - that is said to have adorned the throne room of the 3rd-century Sasanian palace at Ctesiphon, near Baghdad, where it symbolized a paradisaic garden perpetually in flower.40 Like the garden carpets, the Persian installations can represent perpetual gardens of paradise.
While Persian gardens represented the landscape of paradise, it was the pavilions in those gardens, strewn with carpets and adorned with fountains, that represented the architecture of paradise. This important Islamic concept of a paradisaic architecture was also expressed in the plan of the mosque, where the outer courtyard and fountain referred to the garden of paradise, while the mosque itself symbolized the dome of heaven.41
The Persian installations, however, have an additional component: they may be appreciated in two and three dimensions, both as a patterned wall or ceiling "carpet" of color and form and as a three-dimensional “garden” environment, aspects that are especially successful in the Pergolas.
In their aesthetic creation of a perfect, other environment outside of everyday experience, the Persian Pergolas become like the pleasure domes, creating not only a garden of paradise but an architecture of paradise as well, where earthly beauty reflects the perfection of the heavens above. Through Chihuly’s evocation of wonder and his invocation of the marvelous - what the French surrealists called “la merveille” - he succeeds in creating a metaphorical portal to an other consciousness.
Although the natural beauty of glass is easily exploited, the use of its transfomational properties is rarely attempted by artists who work in the medium. Chihuly is a master in the creation of transformational spaces through the construction of an impressive and persuasive mise-en-scene. The sources of his Persians are classical Greek, Persian, Byzantine, Islamic, Venetian, and art nouveau, together representing an incredibly fertile palimpsest of ideas and influences. Yet for Chihuly, the Persians are only one expression of the underlying, purely abstract and formal objective of his work: the exploration of form and the glass itself as a vehicle for color, and the orchestration of color to create transformational environments. The impetus, however, is the marvelous - la merveille - that other, magical world where the source of wonder and delight reside.
- Inscription on a 14th-century Islamic mosque lamp in the collection of the Victoria and Albert Museum, London. W.B. Honey, Glass, Victoria and Albert Museum, London, 1946, p.50.
- Yvonne Brunhammer, Dale Chihuly Objets de Verre, Mus´e des Arts Décoratifs, Paris, France, 1986, p.37.
- Dale Chihuly, interview with Patterson Sims, December 12, 1995; and Dale Chihuly, interview with the author, May 9, 1996. Unless otherwise noted, all subsequent quotations by Dale Chihuly are taken from this interview.
- Walter Darby Bannard in “Dale Chihuly,” Chihuly: Form from Fire (with essays by Walter Darby Bannard and Henry Geldzahler), The Museum of Arts and Sciences, Daytona Beach, FL, in association with the University of Washington Press, Seattle, 1993, p.11.
- For the early history of glass, see Sidney M. Goldstein, Pre-Roman and Early Roman Glass. The Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, NY, 1979; Donald B. Harden (ed.), Masterpieces of Glass. British Museum, London, 1968; Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd (eds.), The History of Glass (with a foreword by Robert Charleston), Orbis, London, 1984; and Marianne B. Stern, Early Ancient Glass, Toledo Museum of Art, Toledo, 1991.
- William Arrowsmith (trans.), Petronius: The Satyricon, The New American Library, New York, 1959, p.58 (Book V, 50).
- Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd, The History of Glass, p.19.
- Dominique Collon, Ancient Near Eastern Art, British Museum, London, 1995, pp.177-187; and Ann Farkas, Achaemenid Sculpture, Netherlands Historish Archaeologish Institute in het Nabije Hosten, Istanbul, 1974, p.46.
- Illustrations of these reliefs are found in Pierre Amiet, Ancient Near Eastern Art, Harry N. Abrams, Inc., New York, 1977, pp.426-431 and 558-561.
- Dominique Collon, Ancient Near Eastern Art, pp.188-210.
- The Roman emperor Constantine exempted vitriarii (glassmakers) and diatretarii (glass decorators) from all public levies in 337, while one hundred years later the emperor Theodosius freed them from personal taxation as well. Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd, The History of Glass, p.53-54, 58.
- Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd, The History of Glass, p.55. The famous beaker preserved in the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, called the Luck of Edenhall, may be one of these Crusader souvenirs and evidently was prized enough by its owner to have had a special leather traveling case made for it. W.B. Honey, Glass, p.47.
- W.B. Honey, Glass, pp.46-47; and Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd, The History of Glass, pp.59, 66.
- Dan Klein and Ward Lloyd, The History of Glass, p.62.
- Ibid., p.63. British art historian W.B. Honey relates that some Damascan glass sprinklers ( a flask with a constricted neck opening) were historically described as “bombs,” or grenade-like containers for “Greek Fire,” although he did not believe such “elaborately- wrought vessels” would be used for such a purpose. W.B. Honey, Glass, p.47.
- Ibid., p.49.
- A Milanese traveler, visiting Jerusalem in 1480, noted in his journal that enameled glass “vases” from the Venetian island of Murano had been commissioned by officials in Damascus. Nearly a century later, Islamic-style Venetian glass was still in demand. Renaissance-period documents record that the Venetian ambassador at Constantinople, Marcantonio Barbaro, received an order for a number of Venetian mosque lamps made in the Islamic style. Ibid., pp.53-54; and Hugh Tait, The Golden Age of Venetian Glass, British Museum, London, 1979, p.12.
- David Talbot Rice, Islamic Art, Thames & Hudson, London, 1965, p.137.
- Michelangelo Muraro and Andre Grabar, Treasures of Venice (translated by James Emmons), Editions Skira, Geneva, 1963, p. 12.
- Massimo Pallottino (ed.), The Horses of San Marco, Venice (translated by John and Valerie Wilton-Ely), Olvetti, Milan, 1979, p.49.
- Michelangelo Muraro and Andre Grabar, Treasures of Venice, p.3. This proposition was made less than 20 years after Venetian Crusaders had participated in the sack of the Byzantine capital, which was finally rebuilt by the Byzantine Paleologue dynasty in 1261.
- Hugh Tait, The Golden Age of Venetian Glass, p.12; and Attilia Dorigato, Murano Glass Museum (translated by Michael Langley), Electa, Milan, 1986, p.18.
- W.B. Honey, Glass, p.37; Ada Plack, Glass: Its Tradition and Its Makers, G.P. Putnam's Sons, New York, 1975, p.31; and Donald B. Harden, Masterpieces of Glass, pp.130-131.
- Guido Perocco (ed.) The Treasury of San Marco, Venice, Olivetti, Milan, 1984, p.13.
- Michelangelo Muraro and Andre Grabar, Treasures of Venice, p.26.
- Ibid., pp.10, 26.
- Guido Perocco (ed.) The Treasury of San Marco, Venice p.26.
- Ibid., pp.129, 134, 49.
- Henry Geldzahler, “Dale Chihuly,” Chihuly: Form from Fire, p.13.
- Ibid., Holland Cotter, quoted, p.73.
- For example, see Mario Quesada (ed.), L’arte del vetro, Marsilio, Venice 1992, pp.116,118,146 (in the collection of the Kunstmuseum Dusseldorf, Germany).
- See Franco Deboni, I vetri Venini (with an introduction by Dan Klein), Archivi di Arti decorative, Umberto Allemandi & Co., Turin, 1989, catalogue no. 90.
- Patterson Sims, Dale Chihuly: Installations 1964-1992, Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, 1992, p.14.
- James Carpenter quoted in Linda Norden, Chihuly: Baskets, Portland Press, Seattle, 1994, p.21.
- David Bourbon quoted in Patterson Sims, Dale Chihuly: Installations 1964-1992, p.62.
- Linda Norden, Chihuly: Baskets, p.25.
- Tsai-Lang Huang, Chihuly: Glass in Architecture, p.8.
- James Carpenter quoted in Linda Norden, Chihuly: Baskets, p.22.
- Karen Chambers in “Dale Chihuly,” Chihuly: Form from Fire, p.17; and Michael Monroe in Dale Chihuly, Color, Glass and Form, p.36.
- Friedrich Spuhler, Islamic Carpets and Textiles in the Keir Collection (translated and with an introduction by George Wingfield Digby), Faber & Faber, London, 1978, pp.100-113.
- Ibid., p.134.